What material should the partition consist of when transporting detonators and shock tubes?

What material should the partition consist of when transporting detonators and shock tubes?

• A. Plastic of at least 1 inch thickness
• B. Concrete of at least 5 cm thickness
• C. Wood of at least 6 cm thickness
• D. Steel of at least 3 mm thickness

Answer: (C)

The appropriate choice for the material that the partition should consist of when transporting detonators and shock tubes is wood of at least 6 cm thickness. Using wood as a partitioning material is advantageous because it provides a balance of safety and practicality. Wood is capable of absorbing impacts, which helps minimize the risk of accidental detonation during transportation. A thickness of 6 cm ensures that any potential impact or pressure does not easily compromise the integrity of the partition, thus serving as an effective barrier between the sensitive explosive materials. In contrast, while other materials such as plastic, concrete, or steel may seem sturdy, they may not provide the same level of hazard mitigation when it comes to explosives. For example, plastic, even if thick, may not absorb shock in the same manner as wood. Concrete is heavy and less flexible, potentially increasing the risk of damage during transport. Steel, although strong, can create a rigid partition that doesn’t absorb shock effectively and poses a greater hazard in the event of an explosive incident since the force could be redirected upon impact. Therefore, using wood of the specified thickness combines safety with functionality in the transport of sensitive materials like detonators and shock tubes.

The appropriate choice for the material that the partition should consist of when transporting detonators and shock tubes is wood of at least 6 cm thickness.

Using wood as a partitioning material is advantageous because it provides a balance of safety and practicality. Wood is capable of absorbing impacts, which helps minimize the risk of accidental detonation during transportation. A thickness of 6 cm ensures that any potential impact or pressure does not easily compromise the integrity of the partition, thus serving as an effective barrier between the sensitive explosive materials.

In contrast, while other materials such as plastic, concrete, or steel may seem sturdy, they may not provide the same level of hazard mitigation when it comes to explosives. For example, plastic, even if thick, may not absorb shock in the same manner as wood. Concrete is heavy and less flexible, potentially increasing the risk of damage during transport. Steel, although strong, can create a rigid partition that doesn’t absorb shock effectively and poses a greater hazard in the event of an explosive incident since the force could be redirected upon impact.

Therefore, using wood of the specified thickness combines safety with functionality in the transport of sensitive materials like detonators and shock tubes.